Skip to content

Triangle Zope and Python Users Group

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home » Boot Camps » Triangle Plone Boot Camp 2005 » Wiki » ObsoleteFixes
Views

ObsoleteFixes

Document Actions
last edited 3 years ago by jimA

Clarifying the meaning of Obsolete in Help Center workflow

I'm trying to clarify the 'Mark as obsolete' transition (and Obsolete state) in HCWorkflow?. Here are some alternatives, based on IRC discussion (comments welcome).

Option 1. Remove the Obsolete state, and replace it with a simple marker

Add a boolean 'obsolete' property on the item. This could be toggled in the Edit or Properties forms (Authors/Managers/Reviewers only?), or with two workflow menu items ('Mark as Obsolete', 'Mark as Not Obsolete'), with no actual state change.

In this scenario, (un)marking an item as Obsolete wouldn't affect its workflow state or its visibility. It would affect its appearance in skins--maybe we add a watermark or other caveat to the item.

In essence, the item would keep its prior workflow state (Pending, Published, etc) but could also be marked as Obsolete.

Option 2. Keep the Obsolete state, but with less effect on visibility

Keep the prior state's visibility? (Is this possible?)

Remember (so we can restore it) the prior workflow state? Or we can look this up in its workflow history...

Option 3. Ditch this entirely, in favor or Rejecting items normally

Perhaps any warnings or caveats should be explicitly added to the document? It might be best to just reject the items normally, but with a comment like "Please note that this is only necessary if you can't use the Blah Blah Product".

PloneCon 2008
Plone Bootcamps
Upcoming Events
TriZPUG September 2008 Meeting: TBD
435 Chapman Hall, UNC-Chapel Hill,
2008-09-25
TriZPUG November 2008 Meeting: TBD
Duke University, North Pavillion, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705,
2008-11-25
« September 2008 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
2008-09-25
19:00-21:00 TriZPUG September 2008 Meeting: TBD
 
 

This site conforms to the following standards: